Security assessment library
Fewer pages. More useful answers.
AEGRIX 360 publishes practical framework guidance and assessment methodology designed to help security teams move from requirements to evidence, findings, decisions, remediation, and proof. These resources support the assessment workflow; they are not certification or legal advice.
AEGRIX methodology
From security signal to remediation proof
See how Pulse, Compass, and Assurance separate context, declaration, evidence, review, findings, remediation, proof, and historical snapshots.
Read guide →NIST CSF 2.0
Build an evidence-based cybersecurity assessment
Understand the six CSF 2.0 Functions, translate outcomes into assessment questions, collect evidence, and turn gaps into prioritized remediation.
Read guide →ISO/IEC 27001
Prepare for information security management readiness
Structure readiness work around scope, risk, controls, evidence, responsibilities, and corrective actions without confusing readiness with certification.
Read guide →HIPAA Security Rule
Organize a technical security assessment for ePHI
Map administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to evidence, risk decisions, and remediation while keeping legal conclusions outside the tool.
Read guide →Decision guide
NIST CSF vs ISO 27001 vs HIPAA Security Rule
Compare purpose, scope, evidence, outputs, and assessment semantics without pretending the three frameworks are interchangeable.
Read guide →Evidence playbook
Build a defensible evidence record
Evaluate provenance, scope, freshness, integrity, design evidence, operating evidence, reviewer confidence, and remediation proof.
Read guide →AEGRIX assessment principles
What makes an assessment record useful six months later?
Context before controls
Scope, systems, sensitive data, dependencies, jurisdictions, and business priorities change what an answer means.
Evidence before confidence
An implementation claim and the evidence supporting it must remain separate so reviewer judgment can be explained later.
Framework-specific conclusions
Evidence can be reused, but applicability and conclusions must preserve the semantics of each framework or regulation.
Remediation over vanity scores
A headline percentage matters less than knowing which gaps change risk, who owns them, and what proof will close them.
How AEGRIX approaches assessments
Signal → diagnosis → action → proof
The platform is designed around a common auditable engine. Pulse provides a fast baseline, Compass deepens readiness work, and Assurance supports structured verification. Across those modes, the goal is the same: preserve context, capture evidence, identify findings, prioritize remediation, record decisions, and retain proof that corrective work was completed.